A bill in Iowa’s legislature to imbue a restrictive version of social studies education upon our young people is not only poorly written but replaces the goal of teaching WHAT happened in history …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you had a login with the previous version of our e-edition, then you already have a login here. You just need to reset your password by clicking here.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
|
A bill in Iowa’s legislature to imbue a restrictive version of social studies education upon our young people is not only poorly written but replaces the goal of teaching WHAT happened in history with the lawmakers’ handpicked narratives. It is an obvious attempt to limit information related to world and American history by excluding certain events, people, and cultures that the party supporting this bill find threatening to their strict morals.
It would take pages to point out all the numerous, serious problems with this legislation. It is misguided historically, developmentally, structurally, and even grammatically -- it is poorly written. It deletes cultural histories of various significant groups including but not limited to, Native Americans, African American and women.
This proposal earns an “F,” and as a teacher I am demanding that lawmakers leave curriculum design to the professionals who have the proper education for creating lessons that actually teach kids. Stop infusing your political objectives into education, and just in case you have banned the dictionary too, here is a definition you need to learn: Indoctrination: teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.
Jeanine Redlinger
Lone Tree